|
||||||||||||
|
Caveat
Emptor: One Never Knows
by John Whetton
|
||||||||
Des and Margaret were about to relocate to La Vinuela, east of Malaga, Spain but with a 'pied a terre' in Lilliput, overlooking Poole Harbour in Dorset as their English retreat. A visit to our Nottinghamshire home and a very close inspection of my cars resulted in a clear instruction from Des, "Get me a Bentley not dissimilar to yours, John; £20,000 ceiling." The challenge was on. Many telephone calls stemming from adverts both private and trade in the RREC Advertiser were made and a prospective viewing list of cars in the 1988-93 age bracket was drawn up. Dealer websites were most helpful in identifying cars of Des's preferred colours of blue/dark green. John Prescott's recently established RRBEW website was also most informative on the Sales & Wants page. In all, my viewing list contained 16 vehicles at various locations from Yorkshire to Kent, with recorded mileages ranging from 77,000 to 150,000 and various prices between £11,500 and £23,000. Stuck for choice, I suppose. All dealer website photographs were most attractive, suggesting immaculate condition both outside and in, but no indication of any defects or blemishes other than the very general descriptions such as 'good', 'excellent', 'immaculate' and 'FSH'. I am lead to believe that at least some of them have had pre-sale, partial or full re-sprays. Numerous telephone calls to sellers enabled me to enhance my impressions. Comparing cars from the various sources yielded a clear differential between those offered by private, RREC members and the retailers in the region of £4,000 to £5,000. Guarantees/warranties made up part of the differences here.
I was attracted by a Brooklands and a Mark 2 Turbo R, both with modest mileages and well priced for their apparent condition. The Brooklands was relatively young (1997 model) but 15% over budget. Discussions with Des over this car resulted in a willingness on his part to go the extra mile if the car was right. An appointment to view the two cars was made. Concern number
1: No land line for telephone contact with the trader. I was steered towards a residential address. The two cars were on the drive. They appeared to be in fine condition following a preliminary inspection. There was no inspection pit or jack for underside inspections. Both cars performed well on the road. I presented the powerful question for each car," OK, what is wrong with them?" Importantly for the Brooklands, only two items needed attention; new front brake pads within 1.500 miles and a surface, rusty blemish to the nearside front wheel arch. When asked the question about his own pre-purchase inspection, the response was that he had a man to do the inspections for him and that more importantly he himself knew all about the ins and outs of this calibre of car. The respective service histories appeared to be satisfactory. I discounted the Turbo R in favour of the Brooklands and was then shown a couple of reasonably priced Eights lined up along with perhaps another six cars in a very long car port at the house. One of them had potential, I thought. On my return home I reflected, reported my findings to Des and e-mailed my further interest in the Brooklands and one of the Eights to the trader and if a deal was to be struck, this would be subject to a thorough inspection by a very experienced Rolls-Royce & Bentley engineer, Gary Bretherton, recommended by a RREC club member. In the meantime, Des had posted to me a signed, open cheque to speed up any agreed purchase I might make. The trust that Des has in me was becoming unnerving, I have to say ! Within a few days
the inspections and road tests were complete and the reports faxed
to me. The charge for the two reports including a fair amount of travel
Having spoken
to other club members, I was advised to walk away from the situation
and looking at a thread on the RREC website under "General"
and the "Dealer Experience" thread, the answer is there
for all to see in specific detail. Why did I not inspect this thread
carefully in the first instance! I had failed to establish connections,
I have to admit. Further searches on the internet added considerable
flavour.
Conclusions and lessons to be drawn from this adventure are as follows: 1) Not all traders and not all club members are necessarily honest. 2) The trader/dealer who only has a mobile telephone, may have neither showroom nor workshop. Some good traders may work from home, however. 3) Vehicle fault evidence offered by a trader/seller and his/her mechanic/engineer may not be as comprehensive as it ought to be. Deception must not be discounted. 4) It is vital that unless you are an experienced, perceptive mechanic yourself, the appointment of a specialist independent engineer should be an obligation on your part. The cost is miniscule compared with the potential heart ache that might develop later. 5) Guarantees and warranties may or may not be offered by dealers. Private sales are unlikely to offer similar comforts. 6) Maybe the second-hand car market ought to move in the same direction I believe house sales will go i.e. a legal obligation on the part of the seller to provide a fully comprehensive inspection report, warts and all and testable in a court of law. Such a move might just flush out the "Arthur Daleys" of this world and increase the confidence on the part of buyers. 7) There are lots of honest owners out there, with cars for sale. There are also some honest traders. 8) There are many, well cared for, modern but older cars on the market that represent incredible value for money and with the potential to offer a new owner many years of pleasurable motoring. 9) If buying a car for yourself has a stress value of 1 on a 10-point scale, buying one for a friend has a value of 10. 10) Caveat Emptor; buyer beware ! The unsuspecting, the unfamiliar, the naïve and the impulsive run the risk of becoming the victims of a very bad deal. 11) Des is a very happy man and is now a new member of RREC. John Whetton |
||||||||